Gross Misconduct in Kenya: A 2026 Guide to Lawful Dismissal

Dismissing an employee for gross misconduct is legal in Kenya, but only if you follow the strict procedure in the Employment Act. This guide explains the law and the non-negotiable steps to protect your organisation from unfair termination claims.

3 August 20266 min readPatrick WekesaBy Patrick Wekesa

Understanding Summary Dismissal and Gross Misconduct in Kenya

As an employer in Kenya, you will likely face situations where an employee's actions are so severe they seem to warrant immediate dismissal. The law provides a path for this called summary dismissal. However, it is reserved for specific, serious circumstances. Understanding the legal definition and procedural requirements surrounding the gross misconduct Kenya employment act provisions is essential. A procedural error can expose your organisation to significant financial penalties at the Employment and Labour Relations Court, even if the employee was clearly at fault.

Summary dismissal is the termination of an employment contract without notice, or with less notice than the employee is entitled to by statute or their contract. This drastic step is only legally justifiable if the employee has, by their conduct, fundamentally breached their obligations under the contract of service.

What Constitutes Gross Misconduct Under the Employment Act, 2007?

The primary legal reference is Section 44 of the Employment Act, 2007 (Cap 226). This section outlines the specific actions considered grounds for summary dismissal. It is crucial for every manager and HR professional in Kenya to be familiar with these grounds.

According to Section 44(4), the following acts may amount to gross misconduct, justifying summary dismissal:

  • An employee is absent from work without leave or other lawful cause.
  • During working hours, an employee is intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, making them unwilling or unable to perform their duties properly.
  • An employee wilfully neglects to perform their work, or performs it carelessly and improperly.
  • An employee uses abusive or insulting language, or behaves in an insulting manner, towards their employer or a person in a position of authority.
  • An employee knowingly fails or refuses to obey a lawful and proper command which was within the scope of their duties.
  • An employee is arrested for a cognisable offence punishable by imprisonment and is not released within fourteen days.
  • An employee commits, or is reasonably suspected of committing, a criminal offence against the employer or the employer's property.

This list is not exhaustive. The Act allows for other grounds that are similarly serious and which would be considered a fundamental breach of the employment contract. The burden of proof, however, always rests with the employer to show the misconduct was severe enough to justify dismissal without notice.

This is where many employers fail. Discovering an act of gross misconduct is not a license to immediately escort an employee off the premises. Both the Constitution of Kenya and Section 41 of the Employment Act guarantee every employee the right to procedural fairness. Failure to follow this procedure will almost certainly result in a finding of unfair termination, regardless of the employee's guilt.

The procedure is non-negotiable and must include these steps.

1. Issue a 'Show Cause' Letter

Before taking any disciplinary action, you must formally notify the employee of the allegations against them in writing. This document, often called a 'Notice to Show Cause', should clearly state the specific misconduct they are accused of. It should reference the relevant company policy or clause in the Employment Act. It must also invite them to a disciplinary hearing at a specific date, time, and location.

2. Consider Suspension for Investigation

In many cases, it is wise to suspend the employee on full pay while you conduct an impartial investigation. This prevents potential interference with evidence or witnesses. The suspension letter should clearly state the reason for the suspension and its likely duration.

3. Conduct a Fair Disciplinary Hearing

This is the cornerstone of procedural fairness. At the hearing, the employer must do the following:

  • Explain the alleged gross misconduct to the employee in a language they understand.
  • Allow the employee to be accompanied by another employee or a shop floor union representative of their choice. Note that there is no automatic right to legal representation unless your own policies permit it.
  • Give the employee and their companion a full opportunity to respond to the allegations, present their case, and offer any mitigating factors.
  • Listen to and genuinely consider the employee's defence before making a final decision.

It is vital to keep detailed minutes of this meeting. The minutes should be signed by all parties present if possible, to confirm their accuracy.

4. Communicate the Decision in Writing

After the hearing, the disciplinary panel or manager should deliberate on the evidence and the employee's defence. The final decision must be communicated to the employee in writing. If the decision is to dismiss, the termination letter must clearly state the reasons for the dismissal, referencing the specific misconduct and the findings of the hearing.

Common Mistakes Employers Make in Gross Misconduct Cases

Our experience in Kenyan labour law practice shows the same procedural errors happen repeatedly. Avoiding these pitfalls is key to defending a dismissal decision if challenged in court.

  • The 'Caught Red-Handed' Fallacy. Believing that catching an employee stealing or fighting eliminates the need for a hearing. This is wrong. The procedure in Section 41 is mandatory in all cases, without exception.
  • Vague Accusations. A show-cause letter that only says 'poor performance' or 'insubordination' is weak. A letter that says 'On 25 July 2026, you refused a direct and lawful instruction from your manager, John Kamau, to complete the weekly stock audit' is strong and defensible.
  • Predetermined Outcomes. Holding a hearing as a mere formality when the decision to fire has already been made. The court can often see through this, and it invalidates the entire process.
  • Poor Documentation. Failing to keep written records of the notice, hearing minutes, investigation reports, and final termination letter. In a dispute, the employer bears the burden of proving a fair procedure was followed. Without documents, this is nearly impossible.

Navigating these complex procedures requires diligence and expertise. Engaging expert HR support can ensure your disciplinary processes are compliant and defensible, protecting your organisation from costly legal challenges.

Calculating Final Dues After Summary Dismissal

Even when an employee is dismissed for gross misconduct, they remain entitled to certain payments. Terminating the contract does not extinguish their right to earned dues.

The employee is entitled to:

  • Wages for all time worked up to the date of dismissal.
  • Payment for any accrued leave days that have not been taken, calculated on a pro-rata basis according to Section 28 of the Act.
  • Any other remuneration or benefits earned and accrued under their contract.

What the employee forfeits in a lawful summary dismissal is the right to a notice period or payment in lieu of notice. Severance pay is also not applicable, as it relates specifically to redundancy situations under Section 40 of the Act.

All final payments are subject to statutory deductions, including PAYE, NSSF, the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF) at 2.75%, and the Affordable Housing Levy (AHL) at 1.5%. Ensuring these calculations and remittances are accurate is critical. Using professional payroll services prevents compliance errors on the final salary payment.

Finally, upon termination, you are legally required by Section 51 of the Employment Act to provide the employee with a Certificate of Service upon request.

While the Employment Act provides clear grounds for summary dismissal, the process is a legal minefield where procedural fairness is paramount. By adhering strictly to the steps outlined in the law and maintaining meticulous records, employers can act decisively against gross misconduct while safeguarding the organisation from legal risk. For the full text of the statute, you can refer to the official Kenya Law Reports website.

Free Download

Kenya HR Compliance Checklist 2026

A one-page PDF covering new-hire setup, PAYE, NSSF, SHIF, the Housing Levy, leave, and annual filings. Sent straight to your inbox.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear answers to the questions our team hears most often.

Yes. The standard of proof in an internal disciplinary hearing is 'on a balance of probabilities,' not 'beyond a reasonable doubt' as in a criminal court. If your investigation provides sufficient evidence that the employee likely committed the theft, and you follow the fair hearing procedure under Section 41, you can justify a summary dismissal.

Patrick Wekesa

Patrick Wekesa15+ years in Kenya HR & corporate compliance

Managing Director & Principal Advisory Director

Patrick leads all client mandates at Two Max Group, personally overseeing every EOR, payroll, and advisory engagement. He has advised international companies, NGOs, and multinationals on Kenya employment structures since 2011.

Meet the full team →